On 3rd January station road was closed off to traffic for the repairs to begin. Below is a photograph of the works, and a progess report on the repair so far.
Bridge I at Broadway under repair - again. |
The railway runs roughly due north from Cheltenham Racecourse, and Broadway station is immediately north of this bridge.
The bridge is a steel plate deck supported by a
grillage of steel girders, as per picture below.
This is a portion of a drawing prepared by our
Consultants – Halcrow. This shows the layout of the “grillage” and also a cross
section through the bridge. It basically comprises 3 large main girders tied
together with a series of cross girders. Running between them are the track
bearers and at right angles plate stiffening angles. This drawing was produced,
after a detailed inspection had been done, to illustrate the 14 areas where
damage had been caused to the structure.
When the bridge was built in 1903, it was
entirely riveted.
A 2014 photograph, taken prior to the first refurbishment. Note the large plate bolted across the front, from an earlier repair in 1975. |
In repairs to subsequent damage by bridge strikes many parts were bolted
together instead. In the 2014 repairs we used high strength torsion control bolts which
have a domed head, with a hexagon nut, to replace many rivets.
Sadly we have to report that since the moderately
serious strike on 27th February 2017, which is the reason that these
repairs were needed, a further strike has taken place on an unknown date. Incredibly, the damage resulting was in virtually the same locations. However this has caused extra damage to the
central main girder putting a localised but large kink in the 3-plate thick
bottom flange
The steelworkers have now managed to just about
straighten the steel again (see photo below).
Centre buckle |
The repair work involves first weakening the
steelwork in some places, and so no trains or any traffic could be permitted
until the repairs are completed. The most important repair is to the upside,
east track bearer, which has been displaced towards the east and badly buckled.
We had to remove the original rivets by grinding off the heads, then drilling
out the shafts. The two bent bottom angles were then removed and the buckled
vertical web plate straightened. Next new angles, site drilled to ensure that
the holes lined up, were fitted and the 3 pieces were then bolted together.
(see photos, before, during and after the repair was completed). Other sheared off
bolts and rivet heads have to be replaced and then all repaired areas will be
painted.
It has also caused extra damage to the east main outer
girder, but fortunately, when we did the enormous repair work in 2014, the
girder was re-built using bolts. Consequently this new repair was much easier
and involved unbolting splice plates (see photo of the removed plates above) and
making new longer ones. Similarly the damage to the west main girder has been
simplified due to the bolted arrangements. See completed photos of both main
girders.
Unfortunately the damage extended to the
worst repair needed, that to the east upside track bearer, was across the westbound
lane. Consequently we have had to close the entire road, causing inconvenience
to all users of this road and especially to the garage and shop, right next to
the bridge. Diversions are in place, and though the problem is not of our
making and costs a lot of money and time organising the work, we extend our
apologies to everyone affected.
At the beginning of this blog post there is a photograph showing the closed road, which has to
include Heras fencing to stop people straying into the working area, and even crash
barriers to stop vehicles running into the Heras fencing at night. Within the
working area we have built a fully scaffolded section on which the men will
work. This bridges the public footpath to provide a protected pedestrian
walkway right through the site. You can also see an area enclosed with plastic
sheeting. This helps to contain sparks, dust, etc from the operations and also
provides an area which can be lit and heated to improve the working conditions,
in the poor winter conditions, and to enable painting to be done, which
otherwise cannot be done below 5 Degrees C.
It is really disheartening to have to suffer more and more strikes after the bridge was refurbished. There may have been more than a dozen now. A number of vehicles involved in the strikes did stop and do the honourable thing, but many did not and could only be observed from the damage suffered, and debris such as sheared off rivets found in the road. As a minimum the damage needs to be inspected and an assessment made after each strike, during which period no trains can run. In a worst case scenario the whole bridge could be displaced, thus closing the railway at Broadway for a considerable time. This could have serious financial consequences for us, now that the extension to Broadway is about to open. The provision of crash protection beams for the bridge, and a system of video camera surveillance, is therefore now being studied in depth.
Writing as a driving instructor, words fail me- I simply cannot understand the sheer number of stupid, unaware, tunnel-visioned idiots who frequent our roads.
ReplyDeleteMuch is made of annual casualty figures, are they up or down, yet nowhere can I find any compilation of costs to property and infrastructure caused by people who quite simply do not know, or care, what they are driving.
Get those bash beams up... and please make sure the lower edges are very sharp!
Mark
Thank for the update on the repairs to Station Road Bridge.
ReplyDeleteGood to see the work involved.
As a retired bridge engineer on the big railway, I have dealt with this type of work a number of times and read reports on hundreds of bridge strikes.
I hope you can get suitable precautions in place with the railway opening to traffic soon.
John,
DeleteWould you be able to find out the date of the big bridge strike at Broadway, which I think took place in 1975? It involved a 360 on a trailer being brought down from Fish Hill. There is a description in the 'Cornishman' but no date is given.
If I have a date, I can check the newspaper archives for any photographs. It would have been quite spectacular, I heard the trailer wheels ended up on the petrol station forecourt!
Jo, the GWSR was at that time under the Western Region and I worked for Birmingham Area Engineers on London Midland.
DeleteAfter the line was closed the bridge records may have been passed on to the BR Property Board who would have, at that time, taken over responsibility for the bridges. They have now gone and after this many years I would have thought the records are lost.
I had difficulty in my job finding records going back ten or fifteen years for operational bridges, forty years later or more with the numerous changes in responsibility would be impossible.
A lot of BR records and drawings were chucked out when privatisation came in and offices were split up between Railtrack and contractors.
Sorry I can't help you with that, I would have liked to seen that myself.
I find it shocking that there are so many HGV drivers who either don't know the height of their vehicle or can't understand the height restriction placed on the bridge. Maybe one answer would be to mount a laser detector on a pole about 200 metres back from the bridge which will activate a flashing warning light on the bridge itself if an overheight vehicle goes through it.
ReplyDeletePeter, this is a national problem. Network Rail recently ran a campaign showing the damage caused to its bridges by road vehicles. Drivers do not know the height of their vehicles. I have seen this first hand when attending bridge strike incidents. The height shown in the cab can be lower than the height of the trailer.
DeleteInstalling height detectors and warning signs are another way to prevent bridge strikes and is one of the methods used by Network Rail.
Acording to a BBC article I saw about 6 months ago, such height warning devices reduce strikes by (only) one third. Two thirds carry on.
DeleteWhile I like the idea of bash beam, I'm not sure it would deter anyone, or reduce damage to this particular bridge, because of the nature of the grillage construction. Secondary strikes seem to do more damage to the weaker internal structural members. Short of lining the underside with steel plating to deflect secondary strikes, I can't see a good solution. More protection means more weight, and something else that could fall on someone's head when it was dislodged. Access for maintenance would be harder too.
ReplyDeleteCatching more of the culprits on camera might be more satisfying for recovering repair costs, but, as has been said above, ideally you want them to stop hitting the bridge.
Eric
The one not far from where I used to live has a thick pipe before the bridge -hitting it does not affect the bridge structure link to a pic -not my pic http://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/3897548
DeleteEric,
DeleteAs long as the soffit level of the crash protection beams is marginally lower than the measured clearance of the bridge itself, in accordance with the Highway Agency's 2014 amendments under BD 25/14, (viewable on-line) then the beam will take the strike and not the bridge. So, all should be well ! I agree with you that a surveillance camera would be a good thing.
Peter
There is a railway bridge in Durham, North Carolina, USA that has a bash beam. At 11 foot 8 inches, it frequently slices the tops off trailers and vans. You can see on this Youtube video that it is installed a metre or two before the bridge and is of very substantial construction. It's helped in this case because traffic only approaches from one direction.
ReplyDeleteSee https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=USu8vT_tfdw
Not sure you'd want two of these substantial structures either side of the Station Road bridge though.
This a terrible business. Thanks to Jo for the update. I'm truly appalled by the serious damage.
DeleteWould a crash protection beam really safeguard the bridge ? And, I imagine it wouldn't come cheap.
Peter Lee's comment is most interesting, but I think the type of bash beam he describes in the USA might not be legal in the UK. Doesn't athe law require a crash protection beam to be integral with the bridge abutments, or something ? As I understand it, a free standing structure could be considered an obstruction of the highway. Maybe I'm wrong about this. I really don't know.
I sincerely hope something cab be sorted out. As the victims, both the GWSR and the local population have all my sympathy.
Peter Wright
There is one at Finsbury Park -posted a pic link on another comment
DeleteYes, I've taken a look at the picture from Finsbury Park, and from what I can see, it's correctly bolted to the abutments. So, it should do the job in accordance with Highway Agency regulations.
DeleteThanks, Kelvin.
Peter
We are trying to get further information from Network Rail on how successful these beam systems are and what happens when they get hit. The design is nearing completion, and it is being carried out to a standard set of long and well established design criteria. Currently the main cross beam will be a 500 Square Hollow section made from 20mm thick steel. Sometimes these are filled with concrete for extra strength and resistance to bashes, and this is being investigated.
ReplyDeleteAs John above says, this is a national problem and I believe that N.R. suffer about 2000 a year. There is one installed at Hyde Lane, Cheltenham at least 5 years ago, and that seems to be providing protection to the bridge and the lighter internal cross beams.
Ah yes, you can see the bash beam clearly at Hyde Lane using Google Street View. Looks like it's been bashed a few times!
DeleteThe comment from John Balderstone, Stuctures Engineer, is reassuring. The consensus of the comments here is clearly in favour of a crash protection beam. And it sounds as though the GWSR will be going down this route.
DeleteIt seems to me a scrash protection beam will only protection if it is sited slightly lowerv than the ridge itself, but I have no doubt John Balderstone is thoroughly familiar with the engineering requirements for the installation of the beam and how it would be secured to the abutments.
So, perhaps we can look forward to some good news soon ?
Peter Wright
There are grass green coloured Bash Beams on the bridge over Spendmore Lane in Coppull,Lancashire. This bridge carries the West Coast main line and has had several hits over the 3 years I have lived here. As far as I am aware the over track has not had to stop but the under road has been closed a few times whilst the offending vehicle and its debris is removed. These beams have done there job.
ReplyDeleteThe bridge on Saltisford in Warwick has protection beams on either side of it after it suffered multiple strikes http://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/1400827
ReplyDeleteThose beams have been up for some years, I have a picture of a refuse lorry on its side dated 2001. I used to be a bridge engineer for the area, so went there a few times.
DeleteIt should be a legal requirement for all vehicles above car and car-derived van size to have the vehicle's height prominently displayed in the cab. Also, bridge height signs should also be displayed at a junction BEFORE the bridge, to allow vehicles the opportunity to avoid being faced with a bridge and no easy way to reverse out, possibly with traffic behind. Of course, it will never be done! Common sense idea rarely are, but maybe GWSR could liaise with the council about advance signs.
ReplyDeleteMost tractor units have an adjustable height sign in the cab, to account for different height trailers. At some bridge strike incidents I have dealt with over the years, the notice hasn't been changed for the height of the trailer being hauled.
DeleteThe A685 near Kirkby Stephen in Cumbria has a bridge which carries the Settle and Carlisle line over the road. If you take a few minutes to view Google Earth street view you can see the substantial brackets that are fitted to the bridge abutments that carry the anti strike beams. Scan up and you can see that the beams have been stuck but the bridge underside remains undamaged. It looks an expensive but worthwhile addition.
ReplyDeleteThanks to everyone for sharing their knowledge of these Collision Protection Beam systems in operation. It is reassuring that they seem to be as effective as we are led to believe. Our external Engineer at Halcrow produced a preliminary design to enable us to get a Budget price and finance has been approved. He is now investigating all current data and details and we hope to go out to tender shortly, with a view to having it installed this summer. We are fed up with chasing and suing the culprits to recover the damage costs, and it takes a lot of time too!!
ReplyDeleteJohn, that's good news. At least if there is a strike the bridge is protected and, more importantly, the trains and passengers.
DeleteAnd, I hope, those doing the striking will take away the evidence of their misdeed with them!
ReplyDeleteBobG
Some years ago I was bemused to read in a local paper an apology by the owner of lorry firm. It was regarding a bridge strike on a major London commuter line by one of his drivers. The apology was to the inconvenience caused to other road users. The frustration of rail users delayed on their way home and the chaos on the line due to 'bridge strike' never entered into it.
ReplyDelete