Following a question raised by a reader about the drip strips we have had added, Bridges Engineer John Sreeves of CH2M Hill has sent us a longer, and very interesting reply which we think will interest our readers. Here is what he said:
During
the restoration of these bridges, we became aware of various shortcomings in
the original design that were conspiring to impair future durability. Most of
the bridge problems are caused by water penetration and poor drainage which we
hope to address, along with improved accessibility to some areas for inspection
and painting. The brick ballast walls at the deck ends were in such a degraded
and collapsed condition that they had to be totally rebuilt. So for the first
time since 1903, the ends of the rail bearers and main beams were exposed to
reveal extension corrosion. Where the brickwork had been in direct contact with
the steel for 111 years, it had not been possible to apply any paint to the
interface, which had attracted water through capillary action. The tops of the
ballast walls were in contact with the underside of the deck plate, where
similar wet conditions prevailed.
As
the ballast walls were to be completely renewed, the opportunity arose to make
improvements to access and drainage details without in anyway compromising the
original design or affecting the heritage of the bridge which we were keen to
preserve. To this end, drip strips 25mm x 8mm were welded on to the ends of the
deck plates so that water can drain freely off the end of the bridge deck and
not percolate along the underside of the deck plate. Furthermore, the addition
of a drip strip serves to strengthen the end of the deck plate which is only
3/8” (9.525mm) thick and is quite flexible. It should be appreciated that the
deck plates were never intended to carry the weight of ballast, track and live
load. In the original design, all of these bridge had directly fixed track on
longitudinal timbers mounted over the rail bearers for direct vertical load
transfer. The deck plates were simply non-structural coverings over the
underlying grillage. Handwritten additions to the drawings show that these
bridges together with the others on the railway were converted to ballasted
track in 1928, which would have been about the time when the original
longitudinal timbers had become life expired. Consequently the additional load
applied and flexure has caused fatigue cracking in the plates which we have had
to repair.
To
ensure accessibility for future inspection and repainting, the ballast walls as
rebuilt are not all uniformly 9” (229mm) thick as per the originals. We have
notched around the ends of the rail bearers and main beams to ensure a 75mm
gap. Also the tops of the ballast walls are kept about 15mm down from the
soffit of the deck plate. The intention is that all metal surfaces on the
entire bridge shall be repaint-able with at least a fine nozzle spray with the
exception of the undersides of the bearing plates. Unfortunately some areas of
the main girders remain extremely difficult to access for cleaning and
repainting where masked by the pilaster walls, but it should be possible to get
a spray nozzle into the gaps in the future. The three-coat epoxy based paint
system we are using is the best available that complies with Highways Agency
and Network Rail specifications, and a 25 year life is expected.
Further
enhancements to durability have been attained by the installation of transverse
filter drain pipes at the back of the abutment walls. It had been noticed that
seepage through the abutment in the vicinity of the bearing plinths was causing
permanent damp conditions and frost spalling. The bearing plinths are highly
loaded but surprisingly they are cut from soft sandstone unlike the indigenous
limestone of the area. Being highly susceptible to weathering it is essential
to keep them dry, so the installation of cut off drains will intercept and
prevent rainwater getting to the upper areas of the abutments.
Finally,
bird mesh has been fixed to the abutment shelf pockets between the beams as the
accumulation of nests, feathers and faeces is very unpleasant and has a
deleterious affect on paintwork!
John
C Sreeves
Thank you John !
Please thank Mr. Sreeves for that most interesting and informative note (although if he's reading the blog+comments, he may well see this himself, in which case here is a direct 'thank you' for taking the time to write up those details).
ReplyDeleteI'm particularly struck by the detail that the rails used to be supported on longitudinal beams which transferred the vertical loads directly into the main structural members of the bridge. I wonder why they changed away from that, to the ballasted track?
Noel